Can Iodine-restricted Diets Normalise Serum Total Thyroxine (TT4) and Subsequently Improve Clinical Signs in Cats With Hyperthyroidism?
a Knowledge Summary by
Oliver Gilman BVSc MRCVS 1*
1University of Bristol, Langford Vets, Langford, Somerset, BS40 5DU United Kingdom
*Corresponding Author (o.gilman.mrcvs@gmail.com)
Vol 4, Issue 1 (2019)
Published: 19 Feb 2019
Reviewed by: Nicola Ackerman (BSc(Hons) RVN CertSAN CertVNECC VTS(Nutr) A1 V1 MBVNA) and Sarah Caney (BVSc PhD DSAM(Feline) MRCVS)
Next review date: 19 Feb 2021
DOI: 10.18849/VE.V4I1.176
In cats with hyperthyroidism, does an iodine-restricted diet normalise the serum TT4 (total thyroxine) levels and reduce the severity of the clinical signs when compared to cats on a normal diet?
Clinical bottom lineWhilst there is some evidence that iodine-restricted diets can help to renormalise serum TT4 in cats with hyperthyroidism, this is not always effective and there is a lack of compelling evidence to suggest this is associated with a resolution of clinical signs in the long-term.
Clinical scenario
Often, a diagnosis of feline hyperthyroidism raises more questions than it solves; with owners striving for a noninvasive and simple treatment for their usually geriatric cat. For the clinician, this has traditionally involved a choice between surgery, lifelong medical management or radioactive iodine treatment. Surgery is invasive, irreversible and carries the risks of anaesthetising a geriatric patient with a strong possibility of concurrent disease. Whereas traditional medical management is lacking in options, often resulting in owners being left with the task of daily/twice-daily tableting of a potentially noncompliant cat. This is often difficult for owners to achieve, and radioactive iodine treatment is only available at limited centres, with owners being required to leave their beloved pet for long periods. What if something as simple as a dietary change could help manage the disease?
Summary of the evidence
Population: | Client-owned cats with hyperthyroidism |
Sample size: | 49 |
Intervention details: | Cats with hyperthyroidism were fed solely on an iodine-restricted diet. |
Study design: | Retrospective case series |
Outcome Studied: | Objective assessment of:
Subjective assessment of:
|
Main Findings (relevant to PICO question): |
|
Limitations: |
|
Population: | Group 1: Hyperthyroid cats previously medicated with antithyroid medications.
Group 2: Recently diagnosed and untreated hyperthyroid cats. |
Sample size: | 225 |
Intervention details: | Hyperthyroid cats were fed solely on an iodine-restricted diet. |
Study design: | Prospective, multi-centre study. |
Outcome Studied: | Subjective assessment:
Objective assessment:
|
Main Findings (relevant to PICO question): |
|
Limitations: |
|
Population: | Client-owned cats over 10-years-old, with suspected hyperthyroidism and with a serum TT4 > 4.0 ug/dL |
Sample size: | 22 cats completed the study. |
Intervention details: | 12 cats were fed a prototype restricted iodine diet and ten were fed a control diet. |
Study design: | Randomised control trial. |
Outcome Studied: | Cats were assessed at 0, 3, 6 and 12 weeks.
Subjective assessment:
Objective assessment:
|
Main Findings (relevant to PICO question): |
|
Limitations: |
|
Population: | Client-owned cats with hyperthyroidism. |
Sample size: | 15 |
Intervention details: | Cats were fed an iodine-restricted diet (Hills y/d, the proprietary diet produced by Hill’s Pet Nutrition) dry or canned version) and assessed at 0, 1, 2, 3 & 6 months |
Study design: | Prospective study |
Outcome Studied: | Subjective:
Objective:
|
Main Findings (relevant to PICO question): |
|
Limitations: |
|
Population: | Client-owned hyperthyroid cats. |
Sample size: | 8 |
Intervention details: | Cats were fed an iodine-restricted diet for 6 months. |
Study design: | Prospective study |
Outcome Studied: | Subjective:
Objective:
|
Main Findings (relevant to PICO question): |
|
Limitations: |
|
Appraisal, application and reflection
During the literature search, it soon became apparent that there were only limited studies investigating the efficacy of the relatively recently introduced iodine-restricted diets for successful control of feline hyperthyroidism. A second point of note was that a substantial proportion of the studies into iodine-restricted diets were undertaken in conjunction with Hill’s Pet Nutrition, a key developer and producer of the commercially available diet, and unfortunately this introduces a suspicion of potential bias in those studies.
Both the papers from van der Kooij et al., (2014) and Hui et al., (2015) used a large sample population, but unfortunately the studies by Fritsch et al., (2014), Scott-Moncrieff et al., (2015) and Vaske et al., (2016) had more limited sample sizes of 22, 8 and 15 respectively, reducing the reliability of their findings.
A limitation of all the studies into this subject is the difficulty in maintaining and proving 100% compliance, as all the patients enrolled in the studies were client-owned and potentially allowed outdoor access. As well as this, documenting an improvement in clinical signs is difficult, given the subjective nature of the task, and made more complicated by the fact that the cats were only assessed by veterinarians at set intervals (it is also unclear whether or not these assessments were made by the same veterinarian). van der Kooij et al., (2014) used an online questionnaire, allowing owners to submit data regarding the clinical signs, however details of the questionnaire are not included in the paper, so its suitability cannot be assessed. Finally, the limited follow-up undertaken during any of the studies reduces the value of any conclusions that can be made.
Hui et al., (2015) included nine cats which had already been taking methimazole as treatment, prior to starting the iodine-restricted diet. Whilst it was ensured methimazole treatment had been halted, and TT4 was over the reference range before starting the iodine-restricted diet and including these cats in the study, there was no information regarding how long the methimazole had been stopped for, or whether TT4 had returned to pre-methimazole treatment levels.
All of the studies found that by the end of their follow-up period 100% of the cats had lower serum TT4 values than when they were started on the iodine restricted diet. Hui et al., (2015) found that by 61–180 days into treatment serum TT4 had normalised in 83% of the cats in the study. van der Kooij et al., (2014) had similar findings, with 75% of those cats having normal serum TT4 by week 8. Similarly, Scott-Moncrieff et al., (2015) found serum TT4 normalised in seven out of eight cats by week 8. Fritsch et al., (2014) reported 50% of the enrolled cats becoming euthyroid by week 12 and Vaske et al., (2016) had 33% of the cats become euthyroid by 6 months into treatment.
Neither of the studies by Fritsch et al., (2014) or Vaske et al., (2016) monitored clinical signs during the iodine-restricted diet trial, so it is impossible to draw any conclusions regarding improvement of clinical signs from these studies. Hui et al., (2015) documented a cessation of the progression of clinical signs, whilst both Scott-Moncrieff et al., (2015) and van der Kooij et al., (2014) showed an improvement, perceived by both owners and veterinarians.
No cats were removed from any of the studies due to concerns about the safety of the diet, or as a result of any side effects, so it can be concluded at least that the diet is safe.
So whilst there is limited literature investigating the efficacy of iodine-restricted diets as a treatment for feline hyperthyroidism, all the studies so far have documented a 100% improvement in serum TT4 when cats have been started on an iodine restricted diet, though this did not always guarantee a return to euthyroid status. There is, however, a lack of consensus regarding the resolution of clinical signs. Further to this disparity amongst the literature, the limited number of studies and the limitations of those studies mean a prospective study with large sample size and– lifelong follow-up would improve the evidence base greatly.
Methodology Section
Search Strategy | |
Databases searched and dates covered: | OVID Medline on OVID SP 1946 – Week 4 2019
Web of Science Core Collection on Web of Science 1946 – Week 4 2019 OVID CAB Abstracts 1973 – Week 4 2019 |
Search terms: | ‘Animal Feed’ OR ‘Diet’ AND ‘Cats’ OR ‘Feline’ AND ‘Hyperthyroidism’ |
Dates searches performed: | 22/01/19 |
Exclusion / Inclusion Criteria | |
Exclusion: | Articles not in English, unrelated to the PICO, single case reports, book chapters and conference proceedings. |
Inclusion: | Articles in English, related to the PICO. |
Search Outcome | |||||
Database |
Number of results |
Excluded – Relevance |
Excluded – Language |
Excluded – Duplicates |
Total relevant papers |
Ovid Medline |
228 | 225 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
CAB Abstracts |
485 | 480 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
Web of Science |
24 | 19 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
Total relevant papers when duplicates removed |
5 |
The author declares no conflicts of interest.
Intellectual Property Rights
Authors of Knowledge Summaries submitted to RCVS Knowledge for publication will retain copyright in their work, and will be required to grant to RCVS Knowledge a non-exclusive licence of the rights of copyright in the materials including but not limited to the right to publish, re-publish, transmit, sell, distribute and otherwise use the materials in all languages and all media throughout the world, and to licence or permit others to do so.
Disclaimer
Knowledge Summaries are a peer-reviewed article type which aims to answer a clinical question based on the best available current evidence. It does not override the responsibility of the practitioner. Informed decisions should be made by considering such factors as individual clinical expertise and judgement along with patient’s circumstances and owners’ values. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help inform and any opinions expressed within the Knowledge Summaries are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect the view of the RCVS Knowledge. Authors are responsible for the accuracy of the content. While the Editor and Publisher believe that all content herein are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication, they accept no legal responsibility for any errors or omissions, and make no warranty, express or implied, with respect to material contained within. For further information please refer to our Terms of Use.